THE ROLE OF PEER FEEDBACK IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ WRITING PERFORMANCE DURING AN ONLINE PEER ASSESSMENT ACTIVITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32529/glasser.v8i1.3129Kata Kunci:
Online Peer Assessment, Peer Feedback, Writing PerformanceAbstrak
Although the benefits of online peer assessment and peer feedback on writing performance have been demonstrated, many learners might not recognize or benefit from specific change responses. This study investigated the correlation between online peer assessment and peer feedback on student writing performance. The correlation test was employed to analyze the data in this study. This study involved 145 undergraduate students (75 females and 70 males) from the State University of Malang, where the English course is mandatory for all students. This study revealed that online peer assessment and peer feedback on students' writing performance had a significant and strong relationship. On the other hand, the differences between the online peer assessment and peer feedback variables in each group were insignificant. Peer assessment and online peer feedback might have a close relationship; they can help pupils enhance their writing skills. However, there were no significant variations in each group's online peer assessment and peer feedback factors.Referensi
Chen, Y. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802646297
Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K. (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1
Ciftci, H., & Kocoglu, Z. (2012). Effects of peer e-feedback on Turkish EFL students’ writing performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.46.1.c
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-assessment in Higher Education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935
Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1363056
Guardado, M., & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2007.03.002
Ho, P. V. P., Phung, L. T. K., Oanh, T. T. T., & Giao, N. Q. (2020). Should peer E-comments replace traditional peer comments? International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13120a
Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Learning through science writing via online peer assessment in a college biology course. Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.004
Liu, J., & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. In Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Vol. 2, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00025-0
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., & Olson, K. (2002). Sea wave impact on a ship moored at the berth with a stilling pool. Magazine of Civil Engineering, 55(3), 103–104. https://doi.org/10.5862/MCE.55.7
Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x
Rada, R., & Hu, K. (2002). Patterns in student-student commenting. IEEE Transactions on Education, 45(3), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2002.1024619
Semeraro, J., & Moore, N. S. (2016). The use of google docs technology to support peer revision. Literacy Research, Practice and Evaluation, 7, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2048-045820160000007013
Shih, R. (2012). Manufacturing aluminium and zinc sacrificial marine anodes. Corrosion and Materials, 37(2), 36–39.
Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009311
Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13558000110102904
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
Tsai, C. C., & Liang, J. C. (2009). The development of science activities via online peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9047-0
Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers and Education, 38(1–3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00069-0
Tsai, Y. C., & Chuang, M. T. (2013). Fostering revision of argumentative writing through structured peer assessment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 116(1), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.2466/10.23.PMS.116.1.210-221
Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students’ performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 JURNAL PENDIDIKAN GLASSER
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
