METODOLOGI PROGRAM RISET IMRE LAKATOS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32529/al-ilmi.v4i1.934Kata Kunci:
Methodology, Program, ResearchAbstrak
This research was based on the limitations of the human mind itself in providing and obtaining reasonable explanations, because at that time the desire to know something was obstructed from various myths which existedin that society so that myths were embedded in human mind. The focus of this research was on the methodology of the Imre Lakatos research program. The purpose of this study was to determine the process of research program methodology from Imre Lakatos. The method used in this research was library research, where the researchers looked for and read sources that match the title to be studied, such as books, articles, writings and journals that were relevant.The results of this study in the Imre Lakatos research program methodology included: First, the core (hardcore) functions as a negative heuristic. Second, the protective-belt which consisted of auxiliary hypotheses in the initial conditions. Third, a series of theories (a series theory), theory linkages where the next theory was the result of the auxiliary clauses added from the previous theory.
Referensi
Abdullah, M. (2011). Pengembangan Teori Akuntasi Berbasis Filsafat Ilmu. Jurnal Akuntasi, 2(No. 2), hlm. 141.
Alihosseini, A., & Keshavarz, H. (2016). Lakatos’s Research Program and The Thought of The Islamic Republic. Journal Modern Applied Science, 10(No. 3), hlm. 58.
Aziz, A. A. (2006). Pemikiran Imre Lakatos (1922-1974) Tentang Metodologi Program Riset dan Signifikasinya dalam Kajian Keislaman. Jurnal Islamica, 1(No. 1), hlm. 43.
Blackburn, S. (1996). The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy Oxford Paperback Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (1974). Falsification and The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes dalam Criticism and The Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Losee, J. (2001). A Historical Introduction to The Philosophy of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mautner, T. (2000). The Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy. London: Penguin Book Ltd.
Muslih, M. (2004). Filsafat Ilmu. Yogyakarta: Belukar.
Naraniecki, A. (2010). Neo-Positivist or Neo-Kantian? Karl Popper and the Vienna Circle. Journal Philosophy, 85(No. 4), hlm. 511-530.
Poespowardojo, T. M. S. (2015). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Riyanto, W. F. (2011). Filsafat Ilmu Topik-Topik Epistemologi. Yogyakarta: Integrasi Interkoneksi Press.
Riyanto, W. F. (2016). Filsafat Ilmu Topik-Topik Epistimologi. Yogyakarta: Integrasi Interkoneksi Press.
Sofyan, A. (2010). Kapita Selekta Filsafat. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Syarnubi. (2019). Guru yang Bermoral dalam Konteks Sosial, Budaya, Ekonomi, Hukum dan Agama (Kajian Terhadap UU No. 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen). Jurnal PAI Raden Fatah, Vol. 1(1), hlm. 22.
Veerhak, C. (1991). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan, Telaah Atas Cara Kerja Ilmu. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Veerhak, C., & Imam, R. H. (1989). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Worral, J., & Currie, G. (1989). Falsification and The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes dalam The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zubaedi. (2007). Filsafat Barat: Dari Logika Baru Rene Descartes Hingga Revolusi Sains. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
