EVALUATION OF TEACHER PERFORMANCE IN UNG LABORATORY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Nurfahmi; Novianty Djafri; Syamsu Qamar Badu

doi:10.32529/glasser.v8i1.3244

Authors

Nurfahmi Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Novianty Djafri Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Syamsu Qamar Badu Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32529/glasser.v8i1.3244

Keywords:

Performance, Teacher, Laboratory

Abstract

The role of teachers is very important in ensuring student success, so the need for teacher performance evaluation is expected to improve the quality of education by helping teachers to realize their potential and be able to carry out their duties effectively and efficiently. This mini riser aims to find out the teacher performance evaluation that has been carried out by the principal of SD Laboratorium UNG. SD Laboratorium UNG is a school that has superior accreditation. The focus of this research is 1) The teacher performance evaluation model carried out by the principal at UNG Laboratory Elementary School, 2) The principal's strategy in improving teacher performance at UNG Laboratory Elementary School. This mini research was conducted using a qualitative approach, while the data collection techniques used were observation, interviews, and documentation, then the data presentation process was carried out using a descriptive approach in the form of words, written, or oral from the subjects observed, namely the principal, and teachers. The results of this study indicate that 1) The teacher performance evaluation model carried out by the principal at UNG Laboratory Elementary School is through performance evaluation meetings and supervision. 2) The principal's strategy in improving teacher performance at UNG Laboratory Elementary School is 1) The principal conducts a selection process in open recruitment of teachers. 2) The principal cooperates with certain parties. 3) The principal motivates and includes teachers to improve their professionalism by attending education and training (diklat), seminars, workshops, and the principal also conducts managerial supervision and clinical supervision of teachers.

References

Aimang, H. A. (2013). Kemandirian Sekolah Dalam Pengelolaan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri Luwuk. Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(2).

Fauzi Ali, M., & Kholisah Nuryani, L. (2023). Meningkatkan Mutu Lulusan dengan Memaksimal Fungsi Manajemen Pendidikan di Sekolah. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 4(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v4i3.251

Imron, A. (1995). Pembinaan Guru di Indonesia. Pustaka Jaya.

M. Ngalim, P. (2000). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Manullang, M. (2005). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. BPFE.

Munawir, M., Erindha, A. N., & Sari, D. P. (2023). Memahami Karakteristik Guru Profesional. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(1), 384–390. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i1.1108

Mutohar, P. M. (2013). Manajemen Mutu Sekolah (Strategi Peningkatan Mutu dan Daya Saing Lembaga Pendidikan Islam). Ar-Ruzz Media.

Parimita, W., Khoiriyah, S., & Handaru, A. W. (2018). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Pada Karyawan Pt Tridaya Eramina Bahari. JRMSI - Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia, 9(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.21009/JRMSI.009.1.09

Purwanto, N. (2010). Administrasi Dan Supervisi Pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Seknun, M. Y. (2012). Kedudukan Guru Sebagai Pendidik. Lentera Pendidikan?: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 15(1), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2012v15n1a10

Sihadi, I. P., Pangemanan, S. S., & Gamaliel, H. (2018). Identifikasi Kendala Dalam Proses Produksi Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Biaya Produksi Pada Ud. Risky. GOING CONCERN?: JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.13.04.21552.2018

Usman. (2003). Menjadi Guru Profesional. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.