This research aims at analyzing correlation between the use of games and students’ motivation. Quantitative method with correlation research design was used in this research. Its population consists of 65 students taken as research sample. Total sampling technique was applied in this research. Two independent variables correlated were the use of games as variable X and students’ motivation as variable Y. Questionnaires used to collect data consisted of 40 items, in which 20 items related to the use of games and another 20 items concerning with students’ motivation. The data were analyzed by applying computer program of SPSS (statistical package for social science) 18. Findings of the research indicate that the coefficient correlation (rxy) is 0.571, with the degree of freedom df = N-2 and the level of significance 0.05 or 5%. Value of r-table 0.244 indicates that the value of rxyis higher than rt (0.571 > 0.244). Thereby, alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted and null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected, so there is a significant correlation between the implementation of games and motivation of students at second semester of grade VIII. It means that the more often teachers use games the higher students motivation in learning English.

Keywords: Correlation, games, and Motivation

Full Text:



Brophy, T. 2004. Motivating Students to Learn. London: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.

Brown, H.D 2000. Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. San francisco State University: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Carrier, M and The Center for British Teacher. 1985. Games and Activities for the Language Learner. London: Nelson.

Chuang, H. Y. 2007. The study of foreign language anxiety, English learning motivation and strategies in the elementary school. Undergraduate Thesis, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan.

Chang, I. 2012. The Effect of Student Learning Motivation on Learning Satisfaction. The International Journal of Organizational Innovation. (4): 281-305

Creswell, J.W. 2005. Educational Research; Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Pearson: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Diana, N.P.R. 2010. The Advantages and Disadvantages of using games in teaching vocabulary to the third graders of Top school Elementary School. Final Project Report. Sebelas Maret University.

Gay, L., Mills. G. and Airasian, P. 2006. Educational research: Competencies for

analysis and application (8th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

Hadfield, J. 1990. Intermediate Communication Games. England: Longman.

Hadfield, J. 2005. Intermediate Grammar Games. England: Longman.

Harmer, J. 1991. The practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman.

Kupečková. 2010. Game-Like Activities. Undergraduate Thesis: Masaryk, Brno

Lewis, G., and Bedson, G. 1999. Games for children. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Lucas, R.I. 2010. A Study on the Intrinsic Motivation Factors in Second Language Learning Among Selected Freshman Students. Philippine ESL Journal, Vol. 4.

Maslow, A.H. 1970. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.

McCallum and George, P. 1980. 101 Word Games. For Students of English as a Second or Foreign Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McMillan, J.H., and Schumacher, S. 2010. Research in Education: Evidence – Based Inquiry the 7th Edition. U.S.A: Pearson.

Riduwan. 2008. Metode dan Teknik Menyusun Tesis. Bandung. Penerbit Alfabetani

Stojkovic, M.K and Jerotijevic, D.M. 2011. Reasons for using or avoiding games in an EFL classroom. Sarajevo

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pendidikan "GLASSER"

SECRETARIAT : Education Journal redation "GLASSER", Teacher Training and Education Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Luwuk, address: Jl. KH. Ahmad Dahlan No. III/79 Luwuk Banggai Kode Pos 94711. View My Stats


Creative Commons License