CORRELATION OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS, MOTIVATION AND ACHIEVEMENT IN LEARNING

FIKRIANI AMINUN OMOLU

Abstract


Fulltime students have more free time than working students. They can spare a lot of time on doing tasks from their lecturers and spend the rest to play or to do any other activity they like. While working students must share their time wisely to make a balance of studying and working. The hardship of balancing these two states in some ways, affects students’ achievement in class. To get better achievement, there are many influencing factors. One of them is motivation. Coming across this situation, it becomes an interesting matter to find out correlation of students’ employment status and achievement, students’ motivation and achievement, and correlation of students’ employment status and motivation simultaneously on achievement. 

Keywords: Correlation, Employment Status, Motivation, Achievement.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anonymous. 2013. How Fulltime are “Fulltime” Students. Policy Brief Commissioned by Complete College America. http://completecollege.org/pdfs/2013-10-14-how-fulltime.pdf.[08/18/14]

Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., and Sorenson, C.K. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education. Belmont. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Best, J. W. 1981. Research in Education. London. Prentice-Hall International.

Brown, J. D. and Rodgers, T. S. 2003. Doing Second Language Research. New York. Oxford University Press.

Cameron, S. 2010. The Bussiness Students’ Handbook. Learning Skill for Study and Employment. Edinburgh. Ashford Colour Press Ltd.

Cherry, K. 2014. What Is the Difference Between Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation?http://psychology.about.com/od/motivation/f/difference-between-extrinsic-and-intrinsic-motivation.htm [07/05/14]

Covington, M. V. and Mueller, K. J. 2001. Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Motivation: An Approach/Avoidance Reformulation. An Article: Educational Psychology Review, Vol.13, No.2, 2001.

Dancey, C. andReidy, J. 2004. Statistics without Maths for Psychology: using SPSS for Windows. London. Prentice Hall.

Farrell, M. 2005. Key Issues in Special Education: Raising Standards of Pupils’ Attainment and Achievement. New York. Routledge.

Harmer, J. 1992. The Practice of English Language Teaching. New Edition. New York. Longman Publishing.

McDonough, S. H. 1983. Psychology in Foreign Language Teaching. London: Geoge Allen & Unwin Publishers.

Nazir, M. 2003. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta. Ghalia Indonesia.

Perna, L. W. 2012. Understanding the Working College Student.http://www.aaup.org/article/understanding-working-college-student [08/18/14]

Perozzi, B., Rainey, A., and Wahlquist, Z. 2012. A review of the effects of student employment on academic achievement. An article. http://www.acui.org/content.aspx?menu_id=122&id=2170 [11/19/14]

Pinto, M.B., Parente, D.H., and Palmer, T. S. 2001. College student performance and credit card usage. Journal of College Student Development, 42,1, 49-58.

Riduwan. 2008. Metode dan Teknik Menyusun Tesis. Bandung. Penerbit Alfabetani.

Sinclair, C. 2008. Motivation and Practice for The Classroom: How Can What We Know About Motivation to Teach Improve the Quality of Initial Teacher Education and its Practicum? Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Watanabe, L. E. 2005. The Effects of College Student Employment on Academic Achievement. The University of Central Florida Undergraduate Research Journal, Vol. 1: 38–47.

Watts, C. 2002. The effects of term-time employment on academic performance. Education + Training, 44,2, 67-75.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32529/glasser.v2i2.17

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pendidikan "GLASSER"



SECRETARIAT : Education Journal redation "GLASSER", Teacher Training and Education Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Luwuk, address: Jl. KH. Ahmad Dahlan No. III/79 Luwuk Banggai Kode Pos 94711. Email:glasser@unismuhluwuk.ac.id View My Stats

 

Creative Commons License